Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies

Rubric

NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:· Properly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed. Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies

20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response identifies 4 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.
17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response identifies 3 peer-reviewed research articles and one peer-reviewed article for the Assignment.
15 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response identifies 4 or less peer-reviewed articles
13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response identifies less than 4 peer-reviewed articles or peer-reviewed articles are missing
20 pts

· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.

40 to >35.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the response Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies.
35 to >31.0 ptsGoodThe response summarizes each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Accurate examples are provided which support the response provided.
31 to >27.0 ptsFairThe response is missing one or two of the required elements or summaries are superficially addressed.
27 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is missing three or more required elements or the summaries are superficially addressed.
40 pts

· Synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles in a cohesive conclusion.

25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentResponse includes a synthesis of the findings in an exceptionally well-written conclusion.
22 to >19.0 ptsGoodResponse includes a synthesis of the findings in a well-written conclusion.
19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response is missing a synthesis of the findings or the conclusion is superficial.
17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is missing a synthesis of the findings and the conclusion is not accurate or is missing.
25 pts

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4 to >3.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3 to >2.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
2 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
5 pts

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts

Written Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.
4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) APA format errors.
2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
5 pts